Burlington Free Press
January 5, 2005
Most
back right to die, survey says
Doctor-aided death has 80% Vt. support
By Candace Page, Free Press Staff Writer
MONTPELIER -- Nearly eight out of 10 Vermonters would support a bill allowing
terminally ill patients to receive medication from their doctors to hasten
their deaths, according to a poll released Tuesday.
The poll found strong support for doctor-assisted suicide in virtually every
demographic group, almost regardless of age, income, religion, education or political
persuasion.
The exceptions were people who described themselves as "very conservative" or
who said they attended church once a week or more. A majority of both those groups
opposed the idea.
The December poll of 500 Vermonters by Zogby International was commissioned by
two groups backing a Vermont assisted-suicide bill -- Death with Dignity Vermont
and End of Life Choices.
The poll questions did not use the words "physician-assisted suicide," a phrase
usually used to describe the bill, but described the practice instead. Pollsters
found 78 percent of respondents said they would support legislation "to allow
a mentally competent adult, dying of a terminal disease, the choice to request
and receive medication from a physician to peacefully end suffering and hasten
death."
"This reflects what I have heard from individuals and families," said Marilyn
Bunker of Chelsea, a member of End of Life Choices and a nurse who worked in
critical-care units for 30 years. "It's amazing how many patients and family
members would pull me aside and ask, 'How much longer does this have to go on?'" when
someone was suffering at the end of life.
She objected to the term "assisted suicide," saying suicide to her means taking
one's own life when death is not imminent. "This is not suicide. It is death
with dignity," she said.
Dr. Robert Orr of Burlington heads the Vermont Alliance for Ethical Healthcare,
a coalition of medical professionals, disability rights advocates and religious
leaders who oppose assisted suicide.
He questioned the validity of the poll results, which he described as contradicting
half a dozen Vermont and national surveys on assisted suicide that found fewer
than half those polled supported the idea when it was described as physician-assisted
suicide or "allowing doctors to help terminally ill patients die."
"Neither question used the word suicide," he said of the Zogby poll. "Several
research articles have shown that how a question is worded makes a major difference
in results.
"These results are especially worrisome in that 40 percent of those responding
said it would make no difference in their opinion if a proposed law includes
safeguards to protect vulnerable patients," he said. "I'm not sure they understood
the meaning or implication of these questions."
In the Zogby poll, respondents first were asked whether a terminally ill patient
should be allowed to take his own life, or whether "only God should decide when
my life ends." Seventy-two percent said a patient should have that power; 24
percent said the end of life should be left to God.
When asked whether they would be more or less likely to vote for a candidate
who supported the legislation, 50 percent said more likely, 13 percent less likely
and 36 percent said it would make no difference.
Support for assisted-suicide as described in the poll cut across all demographic
groups. Low-income people were as likely to support the idea as people earning
more than $75,000 a year. Those with a high school education were nearly as supportive
as those with a college degree.
A 70 percent majority of Catholics and Protestants told the pollster they would
support the legislation.
About 40 lawmakers co-sponsored the Death with Dignity bill during the 2003-04
legislative session. A number of organizations opposed the measure, including
the American Cancer Society and the statewide Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington.
Lawmakers did not act on the bill last year. Groups supporting the proposal hope
the poll -- and a recent legislative study of Oregon's assisted-suicide law --
will encourage the Legislature at least to continue discussing the measure, which
is expected to be reintroduced this winter.
"While I respect people making different choices for themselves, a small minority
of Vermonters should not be able to impose their views on the vast majority of
Vermonters who want more choice and control at the end of their lives," said
former Gov. Philip Hoff, a member of End of Life Choices.
Death and dying: Poll questions
Here are some results of a Dec. 3-4 poll of 500 Vermonters on questions
about physician-assisted suicide. The poll was conducted by Zogby International
and has a margin of error of 4.5 percentage points:
Choose A or B: A. "If I am terminally ill, within six months of dying and with
no hope of recovery, the decision about when I should be able to bring a peaceful
end to my suffering is mine to make in accordance with my wishes and in consultation
with my family and loved ones. (Or) B. Given the sacredness of human life, only
God should decide when my life ends."
Answer A: 360 persons, 72 percent
Answer B: 119 persons, 23.8 percent
Neither, not sure: 21 persons, 4.2 percent
"Would you support or oppose legislation to allow a mentally competent adult,
dying of a terminal disease, the choice to request and receive medication from
a physician to peacefully end suffering and hasten death?"
Support: 388 persons, 77.7 percent
Oppose: 85 persons, 17 percent
Not sure: 27 persons, 5.3 percent
Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for a candidate who supported
such legislation, including the safeguards, or would the candidate's position
not have an effect on your vote?
More likely: 253 persons, 50.6 percent
Less likely: 66 persons, 13.2 percent
No difference, not sure: 182 persons, 36.2 percent